Peters v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Rachel N. Peters |
JP Morgan Chase & Co. |
6:2023cv00044 |
August 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Norman K Moon |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by JP Morgan Chase & Co..(Harvey, Patrick) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase & Co., filed by Rachel N. Peters. (Attachment: #1 Cover Letter)(ca) |
Filing 8 Pro Se MOTION to Amend Complaint by Rachel N. Peters. (ca) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting in part #4 JP Morgan's motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e), and affording Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. JP Morgan's arguments pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 4) are otherwise DENIED, without prejudice, to reraise any argument or issue therein in response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on August 15, 2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(ca) |
Filing 6 Original State Court Records received from City of Lynchburg General District Court, Case Number GV23-2663, consisting of 1 Envelope. (Records available for viewing in the clerks office.) (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(ca) |
Filing 5 Roseboro Notice re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Rachel N. Peters. (Notice mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(ca) Modified on 8/15/2023 - Given the entry of the ORDER at Dkt. #7 , the Roseboro Notice will not be mailed to Plaintiff and the response deadline will be terminated. (ca) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by JP Morgan Chase & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum of Law in support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Harvey, Patrick) |
Filing 3 Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Lynchburg General District Court re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 8/8/2023. (al) |
Filing 2 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by JP Morgan Chase & Co. identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co., Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for JP Morgan Chase & Co. (al) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lynchburg General District Court, case number GV23-2663. (Filing & Administrative fee $402, receipt number AVAWDC-4236852), filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court pleadings, process & orders served, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(al) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Peters v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rachel N. Peters | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
Represented By: | Patrick Alan Harvey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.