Dennis v. Wilmouth et al
| James Gardner Dennis |
| Lori Wilmouth, Kelly Poe and Chadwick Dotson |
| 6:2023cv00051 |
| September 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Norman K Moon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORAL ORDER: The Court has received information from the Virginia State Bar regarding the revocation of Dale Jensen's license to practice law. In light of this, the Court directs Mr. Jensen to inform Plaintiff that Plaintiff no longer has representation in this case, and also to provide Plaintiff's contact information to the Clerk. Upon receipt of Plaintiff's contact information, the Clerk will notify Plaintiff that he has 30 days from the date of that communication for new counsel to file an appearance, or for Plaintiff to notify the Court in writing that he will represent himself. Entered by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 11/1/2023. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.(al)
|
| Filing 10 Reply re #9 Brief / Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. filed by Chadwick Dotson, Kelly Poe, Lori Wilmouth. (Bryan, Debra) |
| Filing 9 Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss , #7 Brief / Memorandum in Support . filed by James Gardner Dennis. (Jensen, Dale) |
|
Filing 8
PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 10/6/2023. (al)
|
| Filing 7 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Chadwick Dotson, Kelly Poe, Lori Wilmouth. (Bryan, Debra) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Chadwick Dotson, Kelly Poe, Lori Wilmouth. (Bryan, Debra) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kelly Poe, Lori Wilmouth, Chadwick Dotson. Kelly Poe waiver sent on 9/11/2023, answer due 11/13/2023; Lori Wilmouth waiver sent on 9/11/2023, answer due 11/13/2023; Chadwick Dotson waiver sent on 9/11/2023, answer due 11/13/2023.(Bryan, Debra) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Debra Marie Bryan on behalf of Chadwick Dotson, Kelly Poe, Lori Wilmouth (Bryan, Debra) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Chadwick Dotson, Kelly Poe, Lori Wilmouth NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Electronic Summons Issued to Kelly Poe, #2 Electronic Summons Issued to Chadwick Dotson)(al) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/11/2023) (al). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/11/2023) (al). (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/11/2023) (al). Modified on 9/11/2023 Replaced deficient pdf documents with corrected pdf documents (al). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons for Wilmouth, Poe, and Dotson by James Gardner Dennis (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued Proposed summons 2, #2 Summons Issued Proposed summons 3)(Jensen, Dale) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/11/2023) (al). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/11/2023) (al). (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/11/2023) (al). Modified on 9/11/2023 Replaced deficient pdf documents with flattened pdf documents (al). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Chadwick Dotson, Kelly Poe and Lori Wilmouth (Filing & Administrative fee $402 receipt number, AVAWDC-4261258) filed by James Gardner Dennis. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(al) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
