Shelton v. Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Shelton
Defendant: Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies
Case Number: 7:2008cv00093
Filed: February 11, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Roanoke Office
County: Roanoke
Presiding Judge: Michael F. Urbanski
Presiding Judge: Samuel G. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelton v. Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Shelton
Represented By: Michael A. Cleary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies
Represented By: Douglas M. Nabhan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?