Martin v. Blue Ridge Regional Jail--Lynchburg Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Martin, Jr.
Defendant: Blue Ridge Regional Jail--Lynchburg Adult Detention Center
Case Number: 7:2008cv00296
Filed: April 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Campbell
Presiding Judge: James C. Turk
Presiding Judge: Michael F. Urbanski
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 05/01/2008. (kab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Blue Ridge Regional Jail--Lynchburg Adult Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Martin, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Ridge Regional Jail--Lynchburg Adult Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?