Arehart v. Keefe Commisarry Network Sales
Plaintiff: Ronald D. Arehart
Defendant: Keefe Commisarry Network Sales
Case Number: 7:2009cv00308
Filed: July 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Roanoke Office
County: Wise
Presiding Judge: James C. Turk
Presiding Judge: Michael F. Urbanski
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE and striking it from the active docket of the court; Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; Motions terminated:. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 08/26/2009. (kab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arehart v. Keefe Commisarry Network Sales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald D. Arehart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keefe Commisarry Network Sales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?