Peyton v. Watson et al
| 7:2009cv00492 |
| December 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Jackson L. Kiser |
| Michael F. Urbanski |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 76 Report and Recommendations and anything else set forth in this order.. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 05/20/2011. (kab)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER DENYING 39 MOTION for Reconsideration; Order GRANTING in part and DENIED in part 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; Terminating defendants Scarberry, Bryan Watson, Harvey and Roberts; Updating caption of case and SET this matter for trial and anything else set forth in this order. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on December 13, 2010. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on September 28, 2010. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on February 25, 2010. (tvt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peyton v. Watson et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
