Vandegrift v. City of Roanoke Sheriff's Office et al
| 7:2010cv00054 |
| February 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| James C. Turk |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
JUDGMENT ORDER in favor of the Defendants Young, Ferrell, and Payne on all counts, denying 177 MOTION to Set Aside Verdict and for a New Trial and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by Thomas Scott Vandegrift, and dismissing as moot the claims against Johnson and the Sheriff's Office. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 8/8/11. (sas)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 3/14/11. (sas)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss; granting 31 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 7/26/10. (sas)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 7/15/10. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vandegrift v. City of Roanoke Sheriff's Office et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
