Williams v. Calton
Case Number: 7:2010cv00075
Filed: February 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Roanoke Office
Presiding Judge: Glen E. Conrad
Presiding Judge: Michael F. Urbanski
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 3/12/2012. (ssm)
October 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 63 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/6/2011. (tvt)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 01/28/2011. (lab)
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Plaintiff's complaint is DEEMED amended; the following claims, as construed by the court in the memorandum opinion, shall go forward: Claim 4(c) and Claim 6 alleging Defendant B. Calton used excessive force. By separate order, the court will direct the clerk to attempt service of process of these remaining claims. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on September 28, 2010. (tvt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Calton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?