Carter v. Johnson et al
Jeremy Scott Carter |
Matthew Belcher, J. Davidson, R. Honaker, G. Horn, Gene M. Johnson, Jeffrey Kiser, J. Looney, Randal C. Mathena, Tammy Mitchem, E. Newberry and R. Wicks |
7:2010cv00342 |
August 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Roanoke Office |
Michael F. Urbanski |
Samuel G. Wilson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 118 Motion for Summary Judgment; all defendants except Mitchem, Horn, Davidson, J. Honaker, Looney, and Belcher are TERMINATED as parties; and the Clerk SHALL set this matter for a jury trial. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 3/11/2013. (tvt) |
Filing 129 ORDER denying 122 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 123 Motion for TRO; denying 126 Motion for Hearing; denying 127 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/29/2012. (tvt) |
Filing 67 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion for Protective Order; denying 53 Motion to Compel; taking under advisement 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 5/27/2011. (tvt) |
Filing 65 ORDER denying 50 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 5/17/2011. (tvt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.