De'lonta v. Johnson et al
| Ophelia Azriel De'lonta |
| R.W. Booker, L. Edmonds, Gene Johnson, L.R. Montalbano, Unknown Defendants and G.K. Washington |
| 7:2011cv00175 |
| April 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| James C. Turk |
| Michael F. Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter about IFP by Ophelia Azriel De'lonta. |
| Filing 6 Statement of Assets by Ophelia Azriel De'lonta. |
| Filing 5 Inmate Account Report by Ophelia Azriel De'lonta. |
Filing 4
ORDER granting 3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/11/2011.
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Ophelia Azriel De'lonta.Motions referred to Michael F. Urbanski. |
| Filing 2 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee of $ 350.00; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/3/2011. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 filed by Ophelia Azriel De'lonta. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment to Complaint) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
