Boone vs. Warden, USP Lee County
| GARY DEAN BOONE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, H. J. MARBERRY, WARDEN, FCI ALLENWOOD and Warden, USP Lee County |
| 7:2011cv00204 |
| May 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Samuel G. Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 5/4/2011. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
34
CLOSED TRANSFER to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia at Roanoke, Virginia. Rather than dismiss the action, the court shall exercise its authority to transfer it to the proper federal judicial district. For the re asons explained in this Entry, the motion to dismiss or in the alternative, motion to transfer 28 is granted as the respondent seeks the transfer of this action to the District where the petitioner is currently confined. The action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia at Roanoke, Virginia. In light of the court's ruling on the motion to dismiss/transfer, the court will not rule on the petitioners motion to amend petition dkt 31 or his motion to supplement record dkt 33 . Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/2/2011. (served by US mail)(NKD) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 5/2/2011.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
