Gemaehlich v. Deputies John Does et al
Michael Gemaehlich |
Deputies Jane Does and Deputies John Does |
Sheriff Octavia Johnson |
7:2012cv00263 |
June 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Roanoke Office |
Samuel G. Wilson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 185 ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 131 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/21/2013. (eot) |
Filing 139 ORDER sustaining Gemaehlich's 130 Objections to 128 Magistrate's Order. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 9/27/2013. (eot) |
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 3/26/2013. (rkm) |
Filing 55 ORDER denying defendants' motions to dismiss the plaintiff's 1983 claims against deputies Kenneth Ferrell, Frank Porter, Jennifer Callahan and Stephen Southerland; granting defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's 1983 claims against Sheriff Octavia Johnson; granting defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiffs 1983 claims against the the defendants in their official capacities and granting defendants' motions to dismiss the plaintiff's state law assault and battery claims against each of the defendants re: Motions 32 39 17 . Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 2/14/2014. (eot) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.