Thornton v. Director of Virginia Department of Corrections

Respondent: Director of Virginia Departmrent of Corrections
Petitioner: Antoine Jermaine Thornton
Case Number: 7:2012cv00443
Filed: September 19, 2012
Court: Virginia Western District Court
Office: Roanoke Office
Referring Judge: Robert S. Ballou
Presiding Judge: Jackson L. Kiser
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 14, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss; Certificate of appealability is DENIED; and the action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 2/14/2013. (tvt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornton v. Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director of Virginia Departmrent of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antoine Jermaine Thornton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?