Burke v. Clarke
| 7:2013cv00380 |
| August 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Robert S. Ballou |
| Glen E. Conrad |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss on the ground of procedural default; Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/8/2016. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
33
Order REINSTATING this habeas corpus action to the active docket re 31 Order Staying Case. The parties are DIRECTED to submit within 21 days from entry of this order any additional briefing regarding the pending motion to dismiss the petition on the ground of procedural default, and each party shall have 7 days thereafter to submit any reply brief. Responses due by 6/29/2015. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 06/03/2015. (slt)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 5/22/2015. (slt)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 09/24/2014. (kab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burke v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
