Miller v. Clarke et al
7:2015cv00634 |
November 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Roanoke Office |
Robert S. Ballou |
James P. Jones |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 OPINION. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 7/13/2016. (slt) |
Filing 31 VACATED PER ORDER 32 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss; plaintiff's complaint as to his claims for monetary damages under RLUIPA and his claims against defendants in their official capacity under RLUIPA and § 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice, but as to all other claims, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff's submission of an appropriate amended complaint denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff is hereby GRANTED until June 1, 2016, to submit an amended complaint to correct deficiencies noted in the court's opinion, otherwise, plaintiff may move to withdraw this action without prejudice. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 5/9/2016. (tvt) Modified on 5/10/2016 (tvt). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Clarke et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.