Fleming v. Clarke et al
Case Number: 7:2016cv00410
Filed: September 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Roanoke Office
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Ballou
Presiding Judge: Jackson L. Kiser
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER granting 89 Motion for Summary Judgment granting 92 Motion for Summary Judgment and the Clerk SHALL assign this case to another district judge of this court for a jury trial in the Roanoke Division (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 8/21/2018. (tvt)
January 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 83 Motion for Order of Parties into Settlement Negotiations; granting 84 Motion for Le ave to File; Nurse Parks and Nurse Crawford may file a motion for summary judgment supported by affidavit(s) within thirty days; and the Clerk shall set this matter for a jury trial if Nurse Parks and Nurse Crawford opt to not file that motion (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 1/30/2018. (tvt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleming v. Clarke et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?