Hodges v. Commissioner Of Social Security
Gregory S Hodge and Gregory S. Hodges |
Commissioner Of Social Security |
7:2018cv00342 |
July 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Roanoke Office |
Robert S Ballou |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory S Hodge. Commissioner Of Social Security served on 7/19/2018, answer due 11/16/2018.(Geddes, Amy) |
Filing 5 SS Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (aab) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Commissioner Of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Electronic Summons issed to U.S. Attorney, #2 Electronic Summons issued to Attorney General)(aab) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 07/16/2018. (aab) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security, filed by Gregory S Hodge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aab) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gregory S Hodge.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.