Sims v. Clarke et al
| William T. Sims |
| Harold Clarke, Henry Ponton, Lawrence Wang, Melvin Davis, Mark Amonette and Teresa Cobbs |
| 7:2018cv00401 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Documents by William T. Sims. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(tvt) |
| Filing 5 Statement of Assets by William T. Sims (tvt) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Order and/or Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by District Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 9/13/2018. (slt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal (Responses due by 9/10/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 8/16/2018. (tvt)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by William T. Sims.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (ck) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by William T. Sims. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibits)(ck) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
