Robertson v. Sessions et al
James P. Robertson, Jr. |
Jefferson B. Sessions, III and John Doe 1 Through 21 |
7:2018cv00507 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Joel C Hoppe |
Jackson L Kiser |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with an Amended Complaint Responses due by 12/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 12/7/2018. (tvt) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Department of Defense. (Clerk mailing summons back to pro se Plaintiff on this date.)(ck) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to STANDING ORDER 2018-9, the U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe is referred to this case. Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer assigned to the case. (aab) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Charles Barnett and Michael Breckton. (Note: Both individuals named are not listed as parties on the docket sheet.) (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued Michael Breckton)(ck) |
Filing 2 90 Day Notice Letter sent to the plaintiff regarding service of process upon defendants. (slt) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 Bivens Act against defendants (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400, receipt number 100003925.), filed by James P. Robertson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.