Paggans v. Warden
Petitioner: Robert Williams Paggans, Sr.
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 7:2018cv00528
Filed: October 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Joel C Hoppe
2 Judge: Jackson L Kiser
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Filing 15 State Court Records received from Supreme Court of Virginia, Record No. 171144. (1 volume) (ck)
December 18, 2018 Filing 14 State Court Records received from Campbell County Circuit Court, 7:18cv00528. Located in the Clerk's office (1 volume) (aab)
December 11, 2018 Filing 13 Roseboro Notice re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Deadline set for 1/4/2019. (slt)
December 7, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE by Warden Pertinent State Court Records (Theisen, Virginia)
December 7, 2018 Filing 11 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Rule 5 Answer. filed by Warden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Theisen, Virginia)
December 7, 2018 Filing 10 Rule 5 Answer RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden.(Theisen, Virginia)
December 7, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Warden. (Theisen, Virginia)
December 6, 2018 Filing 8 State Court Records received from Campbell County Circuit Court, CL17000446-00 (1 file folder located in Clerk's office) (ck)
November 9, 2018 Filing 7 Pursuant to STANDING ORDER 2018-9, the U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe is referred to this case. Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer assigned to the case. (aab)
November 8, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Virginia Bidwell Theisen on behalf of Warden (Theisen, Virginia)
November 8, 2018 Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt as to #4 Order of Prisoner Service (2254) filed by Warden.(Theisen, Virginia)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2254 upon respondents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 11/7/2018. (slt)
November 6, 2018 Filing Fee Received $ 5, receipt number 700058387 (ck)
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC Section 2254; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 10/29/2018. (tvt)
October 26, 2018 Filing 2 Application to Proceed without prepaying fees or cost by Robert Williams Paggans, Sr (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(slt)
October 26, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Robert Williams Paggans, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Petitioner Attachments)(slt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paggans v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Williams Paggans, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Virginia Bidwell Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?