Osborn v. Town of Wytheville, VA et al
| Danny Lee Osborn |
| Chief of Police of Wytheville, VA and Town of Wytheville, VA |
| 7:2018cv00531 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE as frivolous; and the clerk shall CLOSE the case (Order and/or Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 11/26/2018. (tvt)
|
| Filing 6 OPINION. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 11/26/2018. (tvt) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to STANDING ORDER 2018-9, the U.S. Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent is referred to this case. Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer assigned to the case. (slt) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Danny Lee Osborn (aab) |
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 11/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 10/29/2018. (tvt)
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Danny Lee Osborn. (aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Danny Lee Osborn.(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
