Penley v. Duffield Regional Jail Authority
Plaintiff: Samuel Jackson Penley
Defendant: Duffield Regional Jail Authority
Case Number: 7:2018cv00537
Filed: November 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Joel C Hoppe
2 Judge: Norman K Moon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Order and/or Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 12/12/2018. (slt)
December 12, 2018 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 12/12/2018. (slt)
November 27, 2018 Filing 11 Response re #6 Order Prisoner Condfil filed by Samuel Jackson Penley. (ck)
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with the Consent to Withholding of Filing Fees Form Responses due by 12/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/15/2018. (tvt)
November 15, 2018 Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Samuel Jackson Penley (Attachments: #1 Envelopes)(tvt)
November 15, 2018 Filing 8 Response re #6 Order Prisoner Conditional Filed filed by Samuel Jackson Penley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(tvt)
November 9, 2018 Filing 7 Pursuant to STANDING ORDER 2018-9, the U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe is referred to this case. Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to Joel C. Hoppe. (ck)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 11/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 11/2/2018. (slt)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 11/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 11/2/2018. (slt)
November 1, 2018 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) by Samuel Jackson Penley (ck)
November 1, 2018 Filing 3 Statement of Assets by Samuel Jackson Penley (ck)
November 1, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Samuel Jackson Penley.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (ck)
November 1, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Samuel Jackson Penley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ck)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Penley v. Duffield Regional Jail Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duffield Regional Jail Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Jackson Penley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?