Richardson v. Bowels et al
Plaintiff: Chaze Richardson
Defendant: B. Waters, Lt. J. Bowels and M. Breckon
Case Number: 7:2018cv00576
Filed: November 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Elizabeth K Dillon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Richardson's second motion for an extension of time to comply with the court's conditional filing order (Dkt. No. 6) is GRANTED and Richardson shall have thirty days from the entry of this order to comply with the court's November 16, 2018 conditional filing order. Responses due by 2/5/2019Entered by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 1/3/2019. (tvt)
December 18, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order Prisoner Conditional filed Order by Chaze Richardson.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (tvt)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Responses due by 12/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 11/29/2018. (slt)
November 29, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order Prisoner Condfil, by Chaze Richardson.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(slt)
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC Section 1331 Bivens Act; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 12/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 11/16/2018. (tvt)
November 16, 2018 Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Chaze Richardson (ck)
November 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 Bivens Act against All Defendants, filed by Chaze Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(ck)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Bowels et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Waters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. J. Bowels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Breckon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chaze Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?