United States of America v. Gearhart et al
United States of America |
Wysor Gearhart, George W Gearhart, Jr. and Suntrust Bank |
7:2018cv00615 |
December 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Michael F Urbanski |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by George W Gearhart, Jr, Wysor Gearhart, Suntrust Bank, United States of America. (sas) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (sas) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint #1 by Wysor Gearhart.(Miller, Joel) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint #1 by George W Gearhart, Jr.(Miller, Joel) |
Filing 5 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Suntrust Bank (Egeli, Matthew) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint #1 by Suntrust Bank.(Egeli, Matthew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Alfred Egeli on behalf of Suntrust Bank (Egeli, Matthew) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to George W Gearhart, Jr, Wysor Gearhart, Suntrust Bank NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 summons - Wysor Gearhart, #2 summons - Suntrust Bank)(sas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George W Gearhart, Jr, Wysor Gearhart, Suntrust Bank, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.