Cunningham v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC et al
Billie Michelle Cunningham |
John Does 1-25, Federal Pacific Credit Company LLC and Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC |
7:2019cv00034 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Federal Pacific Credit Company LLC on 1/25/19, filed by Billie Michelle Cunningham.(Stein, Aryeh) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Billie Michelle Cunningham. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC waiver sent on 1/18/2019, answer due 3/19/2019.(Stein, Aryeh) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC, Federal Pacific Credit Company LLC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 electronic summons issued as to Federal Pacific Credit Company LLC)(ams) |
Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC, Federal Pacific Credit Company LLC, John Does 1-25 (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400. Receipt #4023-3052371), filed by Billie Michelle Cunningham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.