Rajah v. Davis et al
| Eric Valentino Rajah |
| John Hurley, John Horn, Yvonne Taylor, Charlotte Shelton, John Hale, James Wade and Clint Davis |
| 7:2019cv00264 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Glen E Conrad |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Production of Documents- "Motion of Subpoena for documentary and video recordings evidence" by Eric Valentino Rajah.(ck) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Discovery by Eric Valentino Rajah. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (ck) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Valentino Rajah. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (ck) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Eric Valentino Rajah (ck) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Eric Valentino Rajah (ck) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Clint Davis, John Hale, John Horn, John Hurley, Charlotte Shelton, Yvonne Taylor, James Wade, filed by Eric Valentino Rajah. (Attachments: #1 Grievances, #2 Proposed Summons-Clint Davis, #3 Proposed Summons- John Hale, #4 Proposed Summons- John Horn, #5 Proposed Summons- John Hurly, #6 Proposed Summons-Charlotte Shelton, #7 Proposed Summons-Yvonne Taylor, #8 Proposed Summons- James Wade)(ck) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
