Johnson v. Glenn et al
Christopher Shane Johnson |
Andrew Johnson, Scott County District Court and Andrew Berry Glenn |
7:2019cv00385 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Michael F Urbanski |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: re #4 Memorandum Opinion, #5 Order Dismissing Case regarding Christopher Shane Johnson; (No forwarding address given) (slt) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Order and/or Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/21/2019. (tvt) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/21/2019. (tvt) |
Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 6/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 5/23/2019. (slt) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and statement of Assets by Christopher Shane Johnson (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(slt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Shane Johnson.(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.