Gay v. Shuler et al
| Christopher Daniel Gay |
| Mr. Chip Shuler and Mr. David P. Helms |
| 7:2019cv00439 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Christopher Daniel Gay (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(slt) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David P. Helms, Chip Shuler, filed by Christopher Daniel Gay. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(aab) |
Filing 4
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 7/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 6/12/2019. (tvt)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Christopher Daniel Gay (tvt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Daniel Gay. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (tvt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against David P. Helms, Chip Shuler, filed by Christopher Daniel Gay.(tvt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
