Anderson v. Lee, et al
Plaintiff: David Wayne Anderson
Defendant: Honorable Travis Lee and Washington County General District Court
Case Number: 7:2019cv00494
Filed: July 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Michael F Urbanski
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 8/21/2019. (slt)
August 21, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David Wayne Anderson. Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (slt)
August 2, 2019 Filing 10 Additional Evidence by David Wayne Anderson (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(slt)
July 24, 2019 Filing 9 Additional Evidence by David Wayne Anderson (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aab)
July 22, 2019 Filing 8 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff David Wayne Anderson (slt)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 8/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/12/2019. (slt)
July 12, 2019 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Account Report by David Wayne Anderson (slt)
July 12, 2019 Filing 5 Additional Evidence by David Wayne Anderson (aab)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 8/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/12/2019. (slt)
July 11, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Wayne Anderson. Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (aab)
July 11, 2019 Filing 2 Statement of Assets by David Wayne Anderson (aab)
July 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Honorable Travis Lee, Washington County General District Court, filed by David Wayne Anderson.(aab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Lee, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honorable Travis Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington County General District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Wayne Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?