Betancourt v. Clarke
| Rebecca L. Betancourt |
| Mr. Harold Clarke |
| 7:2019cv00583 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Jackson L Kiser |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order for Plaintiff to Respond with the six-month trust fund account statements (Feb.-July) within 20 days. Responses due by 10/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 10/4/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) by Rebecca L. Betancourt (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(slt) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) by Rebecca L. Betancourt (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(slt) |
|
Filing 8
ORAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Betancourt's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 7) to comply with the court's conditional filing order (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED and Betancourt shall have twenty-one days to comply with the court's previous order (ECF No. 3). The Clerk shall send a copy of this order and a copy of the conditional filing order (ECF No. 3) to Betancourt. Betancourt is reminded that failure to comply within the time allotted will result in dismissal of her case without prejudice. Entered by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 9/18/2019. (aab)
|
| Filing 9 Request for 2254 form by Rebecca L. Betancourt. (Clerk sending form) (aab) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order Prisoner Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983, by Rebecca L. Betancourt. (aab) |
| Filing 6 Response re #5 Letter requesting IFP. (aab) |
| Filing 5 Letter requesting IFP by Rebecca L. Betancourt. (aab) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Rebecca L. Betancourt. (aab) |
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 9/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 8/27/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Rebecca L. Betancourt. (aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Harold Clarke, filed by Rebecca L. Betancourt. (complaint received in envelope with different inmate name)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Betancourt v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mr. Harold Clarke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rebecca L. Betancourt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
