Keith v. Hall et al
| Samantha Keith |
| Averitt Express, Inc. and Jamerian Dijon Moon Hall |
| 7:2019cv00597 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Glen E Conrad |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service served on Averitt Express, Inc. on 09/13/2019, filed by Samantha Keith.(Zebrak, Kaitlin) |
| Filing 5 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint #1 with JURY DEMAND by Averitt Express, Inc. and Jamerian Dijon Moon Hall.(Moyers, Jason) Modified on 9/19/2019 to indicate Jamerian Dijon Moon Hall as a filer (sas). |
| Filing 4 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Averitt Express, Inc. (Moyers, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Samantha Keith. (ams) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Jamerian Dijon Moon Hall NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Averitt Express, Inc.)(ams) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Averitt Express, Inc., Jamerian Dijon Moon Hall (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400 receipt # 0423-3218765), filed by Samantha Keith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
