Krupp v. Gujral et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Krupp
Defendant: Inder Gujral, Vytas Kazlauskas and Shadi Ayyas
Case Number: 7:2019cv00619
Filed: September 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Glen E Conrad
Referring Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 10/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 9/11/2019. (slt)
September 11, 2019 Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 2:19-cv-00381. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 11, 2019 Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 9/11/2019.]
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TRANSFER ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to conditionally file Plaintiff's Complaint as subject to defect. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned case shall be, and hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to effectuate the transfer of this matter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 9/11/2019. Copies mailed 9/11/2019.(jmey, ) Modified on 9/11/2019 to edit docket text. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 9/11/2019.]
July 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed (SUBJECT TO DEFECT) against Shadi Ayyas, Inder Gujral, Vytas Kazlauskas (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Kevin Krupp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (No service copies provided.)(jmey, ) Modified on 9/11/2019 per #2 Order. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 9/11/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krupp v. Gujral et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inder Gujral
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vytas Kazlauskas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shadi Ayyas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Krupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?