Taylor v. Clark et al
| Daniel Taylor |
| Ferguson, Church, Carl Manis, Stacy, Cochran, Harold Clark, Isbell, Carber, Williams, Thomas Jones and Hylton |
| 7:2019cv00636 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Responses due by 11/14/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 10/22/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order Prisoner Condfil, by Daniel Taylor. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt) |
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 10/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 9/24/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 2 Verified Statement by Plaintiff Daniel Taylor (aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Daniel Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
