Cox v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
| Albert V. Cox |
| Major Eric Young, Superintendent Jeffery Newton and Middle River Regional Jail |
| 7:2019cv00653 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Glen E Conrad |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Order and/or Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/28/2019. (tvt)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/28/2019. (tvt) |
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 10/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/1/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and statement of Assets by Albert V. Cox (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Middle River Regional Jail, Jeffery Newton, Eric Young, filed by Albert V. Cox.(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
