Case II v. Danville City Sheriff's Office et al
| Patrick Lee Case II |
| Ms. FNU Seepe, Capt. Martin, Mr. FNU Bugsby, Lt. Petty, Danville City Sheriff's Office, Mrs. FNU Heist, Sgt. Ryan, Sgt. Wilkerson, Mr. FNU Meyers, Mr. FNU Dix, Mrs. FNU Berger and Lt. Brae |
| 7:2019cv00745 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Norman K Moon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 1/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 12/17/2019. (tvt)
|
| Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Patrick Lee Case II (ck) |
|
Filing 10
Order for Plaintiff to Respond with the six month statements (Apr-Sept) within 20 days. Responses due by 12/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 12/2/2019. (slt)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/27/2019. (tvt)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Patrick Lee Case II. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt) |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and statement of Assets by Patrick Lee Case II (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets, #2 Copy of Order entered in 719cv00719) (slt). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Patrick Lee Case II. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (Attachments: #1 AMENDED COMPLAINT, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Table of Contents of Exhibits, #4 Table of Authority)(slt) |
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 12/2/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/5/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 3:19-cv-00786. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is FILED solely for the administrative convenience of the Clerk. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk of this Court is DIRECTED to transfer all pleadings filed in this action and a copy of the docket sheet to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 11/5/2019. Copy to Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 11/5/2019.]
|
| Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia. (jsmi, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 11/5/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Berger, Lt. Brae, FNU Bugsby, Danville City Sheriff's Office, FNU Dix, FNU Heist, Capt. Martin, FNU Meyers, Lt. Petty, Sgt. Ryan, FNU Seepe, Sgt. Wilkerson, filed by Patrick Lee Case II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 11/5/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
