Wilson v. Williams et al
| Marshall Edward Wilson |
| Chief Jim Williams, City of Staunton, J.L. Campbell, Stephan F. Owen, Unknown Police Officers 1-6, E.L. Shifflett, Carolyn W. Dull and Kattie Shifflett |
| 7:2019cv00822 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Norman K Moon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Marshall Edward Wilson (tvt) |
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 1/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 12/10/2019. (tvt)
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and statement of Assets by Marshall Edward Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against J.L. Campbell, City of Staunton, Carolyn W. Dull, Stephan F. Owen, E.L. Shifflett, Kattie Shifflett, Unknown Police Officers 1-6, Jim Williams, filed by Marshall Edward Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
