Britt v. Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc.
Joseph Britt |
Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. |
7:2019cv00882 |
December 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 In Chambers Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon: Status Conference held by conference call on 2/27/2020. (bwd) |
Filing 13 NOTICE by Joseph Britt Notice of Filing of Consent to Become Party (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Consent to Become Party - P. Mendoza)(Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Hearing: (N) (No Interpreter requested) Rule 16 Status Conference set for February 27, 2020 at 10:00 AM by telephone conference call before Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon. (Chambers sent the dial-in instructions to the parties.)(mf) |
Filing 11 Scheduling Letter (bwd) |
Filing 10 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (ams) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND by Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc..(Gerrish, Andrew) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Bruce Mayer, Registered Agent for Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. on 1/8/2020, filed by Joseph Britt.(Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. answer due 2/12/2020. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 01/22/2020. (ams) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schnetzler, Nathan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Henry Schnetzler on behalf of Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. (Schnetzler, Nathan) |
Filing 4 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. (Gerrish, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Shane Gerrish on behalf of Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. (Gerrish, Andrew) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(ams) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400 receipt number 0423-3298361.), filed by Joseph Britt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Britt v. Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Britt | |
Represented By: | Craig Juraj Curwood |
Represented By: | Timothy Lawrence Coffield |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nathan Henry Schnetzler |
Represented By: | Andrew Shane Gerrish |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.