Stanfield v. Clarke et al
| Bradley Louis Stanfield |
| Harold W. Clarke, I. Gilmore, Hubbs, Jonathan Kaufman and Hibbs |
| 7:2020cv00363 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Norman K Moon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Bradley Louis Stanfield. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Jonathan Kaufman on 8/10/2020. (Service paperwork mailed to Defendant(s) at address provided) Waiver of Service due by 9/9/2020.(slt) |
| Filing 17 Response re #16 Order to Respond - Prisoner, . filed by Bradley Louis Stanfield. (slt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2020: #1 Last known addresses for Defendant Jonathan Kaufman (slt). |
Filing 16
Order for Defendant(s) to Respond with the last known address if known for defendant Kaufman, filed in confidence, under seal within 7 days Responses due by 8/14/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/4/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Hubbs, I. Gilmore, Harold W. Clarke. Hubbs waiver sent on 7/9/2020, answer due 9/8/2020; I. Gilmore waiver sent on 7/9/2020, answer due 9/8/2020; Harold W. Clarke waiver sent on 7/9/2020, answer due 9/8/2020.(Vorhis, Richard) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Declination of Service .(Vorhis, Richard) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Carson Vorhis on behalf of Harold W. Clarke, I. Gilmore, Hubbs (Vorhis, Richard) |
| Filing 12 Response re #11 Letter asking about service of complaint upon defendants. (tvt) |
| Filing 11 Letter asking about service of complaint upon defendants by Bradley Louis Stanfield (tvt) |
| Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Service (OAG 1983) sent to Harold W. Clarke, et al on 7/9/2020. Pursuant to the agreement of electronic service. Waiver of Service due by 8/10/2020.(slt) |
|
Filing 9
Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants Harold W. Clarke, I. Gilmore, Hubbs, Jonathan Kaufman re #1 Complaint filed by Bradley Louis Stanfield. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 7/9/2020. (slt) (This order is a duplicate of DE#8.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Service of Process. The Clerk is directed to notify defendants all of whom are Virginia Department of Corrections employees of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 7/9/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
| Filing 7 Response re #6 Letter regarding copies of complaint .. (aab) |
| Filing 6 Letter regarding copies of complaint by Bradley Louis Stanfield (aab) |
| Filing 5 Motion for Service of Process by Bradley Louis Stanfield. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 6/25/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Bradley Louis Stanfield. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Harold W. Clarke, I. Gilmore, Hubbs, Jonathan Kaufman, filed by Bradley Louis Stanfield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-G)(aab) |
| Filing Fee Received $ 400.00, receipt number 700064304 (aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
