Smith v. Streeval
| Brennen M. Smith |
| J.C. Streeval |
| 7:2020cv00439 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (WDVA) will be going live on the Next Generation of CM/ECF (NextGen CM/ECF) Tuesday, October 13, 2020. Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a two-step process. Step One is that each attorney must upgrade their individual PACER account, no shared accounts within firms will be allowed. Check and see if your PACER account is an "Upgraded" PACER account. Many PACER accounts have already been upgraded. If any of the following is true, you have an upgraded PACER account and no action is required until after the VAWD NextGen CM/ECF upgrade on October 13, 2020: 1) You have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen Court or 2) Your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014. If none of these are true, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account before you will be able to link your PACER account to your VAWD CM/ECF account for your new NextGen CM/ECF account. Click #here to learn how to upgrade your PACER Account. If you still have questions regarding your PACER account, please contact the PACER Service Center 800- 676-6856. Complete information regarding the WDVA NextGen CM/ECF implementation can be found at #NextGen Information. (mzc) (ADI)
|
|
4 Order on Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail (slt)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/18/20. (Order to be mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(PMS)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion to Supplement Petition by Brennen M. Smith. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Memorandum and Supporting Documents)(ck)
|
|
Filing 2
Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2241 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brennen M. Smith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/4/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
|
Filing Fee Received $ 5, receipt number 7-64722 (ck)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Brennen M. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibits)(ck)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Streeval | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: J.C. Streeval | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brennen M. Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
