Riddick v. Gilbert et al
Plaintiff: Steve Riddick
Defendant: Hearings Officer L. Mullens, Warden Jeffrey Kiser and C/O J. Gilbert
Case Number: 7:2020cv00598
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Glen E Conrad
Referring Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Response re #7 Letter .. (slt)
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter regarding service by Steve Riddick (slt)
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Copy of Consent to Fee by Steve Riddick (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(slt)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Steve Riddick (tvt)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 11/25/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/2/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Account Report and statement of Assets by Steve Riddick (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(slt)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 10/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/6/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against J. Gilbert, Jeffrey Kiser, L. Mullens, filed by Steve Riddick.(tvt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riddick v. Gilbert et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Riddick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hearings Officer L. Mullens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Jeffrey Kiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O J. Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?