Craft v. Streeval
Petitioner: Eric Craft
Respondent: J.C. Streeval
Case Number: 7:2020cv00779
Filed: December 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Joel C Hoppe
Referring Judge: Michael F Urbanski
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Oral ORDER -It is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's second motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because appointment is not in "the interests of justice," see 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 2/9/2021. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Eric Craft. (slt)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order to Consolidate Cases 7:20cv00779 and 7:21cv00085. All future filings shall be only in this case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to docket the petition in the transferred case (Dkt. No. 1 in Case No. 7:21-cv-00085) as a supplemental petition in the -779 case. Streeval shall remain as the sole respondent in the case, and the Clerk shall STRIKE Case No. 7:21- cv-00085 from the active docket of the court. Respondent will be given additional time to file his response, which should respond to both the original and supplemental petitions. He shall file his response not later than sixty days after entry of this order, and petitioner shall have twenty-one days thereafter to file a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 2/9/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order PAID-Filing Fee Received $ 5.00, receipt number 7-66732 (slt)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Craft. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 1/19/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2241 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Craft. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 1/19/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
December 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Consent to Fee by Petitioner Eric Craft (tvt)
December 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Craft. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (tvt)
December 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Eric Craft.(tvt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Craft v. Streeval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J.C. Streeval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric Craft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?