Tinsley v. Clark
Jimmy Edward Tinsley |
Harold W. Clark |
7:2021cv00270 |
May 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Thomas T Cullen |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2254 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jimmy Edward Tinsley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 6/29/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 8 Petitioner's Response re #7 Order to Respond - Prisoner, . filed by Jimmy Edward Tinsley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(slt) |
Filing 7 Order for Petitioner to Respond with any additional argument or evidence petitioner desires to present concerning the timeliness of the petition under 2244(d). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS PARAGRAPH MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE PETITION. In the alternative, petitioner may move to withdraw this petition without prejudice so that any future claims petitioner may wish to bring under 28 U.S.C. 2254 will not be considered successive and be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b). Responses due by 6/21/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 5/28/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 1:21-cv-00526. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 5 ORDER that this action be and is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 5/4/21. Copy sent to pro se by chambers.(klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (c/m on 5/3/21) (klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
Filing 3 Truth AFFIDAVIT by Jimmy Edward Tinsley. (klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Reconsideration by Jimmy Edward Tinsley. (klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jimmy Edward Tinsley. (Attachments: #1 attachment, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope, #4 Prisoner data)(klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
PRO SE flag(s) set. (klau, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/4/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tinsley v. Clark | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Harold W. Clark | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jimmy Edward Tinsley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.