Alexander v. Ely et al
| Jensen Ken Alexander |
| Mr. Cheeks, Mr. Houndshell, Carl Manis, Joseph Ely, Mr. Clouse and Richard Light |
| 7:2021cv00312 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Jensen Ken Alexander. (slt)
|
|
Filing 4
Declaration to Proceed with Case by Jensen Ken Alexander (slt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 6/11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 5/19/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Jensen Ken Alexander (tvt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Mr. Cheeks, Mr. Clouse, Joseph Ely, Mr. Houndshell, Richard Light, Carl Manis, filed by Jensen Ken Alexander.This civil action is only to Claim(2) (Attachments: #1 Attachment -Grievances- Informal Complaint, #2 Opinion & Order from case 7:20-cv-00766)(tvt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
