Hampton v. Clarke
| Eugene Scott Hampton |
| Harold W. Clarke |
| 7:2021cv00398 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Clerk's Office Response re #10 Letter .. (slt)
|
|
Filing 13
Motion to get copy of DNA and Finger-print affidavits by Eugene Scott Hampton. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt)
|
|
Filing 12
Motion for Exhibits A, B, C, D already filed on 2241 be treated towards 2254 by Eugene Scott Hampton. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eugene Scott Hampton. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt)
|
|
Filing 10
Letter regarding exhibits by Eugene Scott Hampton. (slt)
|
|
PAID-Filing Fee Received $ 5.00, receipt number 7-69109 (slt)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Lynsie Yates on behalf of Harold W. Clarke (Yates, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 8
Acknowledgment of Receipt as to #7 Order of Prisoner Service (2254), filed by Harold W. Clarke.(Yates, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 7
Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2254 upon respondents re #5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eugene Scott Hampton. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/6/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent to Fee by Petitioner Eugene Scott Hampton (slt)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Eugene Scott Hampton.(slt)
|
|
Filing 4
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC Section 2254; Regarding 2254 form, Consent to Fee; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days Responses due by 8/17/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 7/15/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eugene Scott Hampton. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Account Report for June 2020-May 2021 by Eugene Scott Hampton (slt)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Eugene Scott Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Cover Letter)(slt) Modified on 7/12/2021-updated docket text to reflect correct code section for case. (slt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hampton v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eugene Scott Hampton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Harold W. Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Lynsie Yates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
