Lam v. Rockingham/Harrisonburg Circuit Court et al
Plaintiff: Steven Wesley Lam
Defendant: Rockingham/Harrisonburg Circuit Court, District 39 Probation and Parol, District 12 Probation and Parol and Rockingham County Commonwealth Attorneys
Case Number: 7:2021cv00422
Filed: July 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Thomas T Cullen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 8/26/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 8/26/2021. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Steven Wesley Lam (aab)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 8/18/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/26/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and statement of Assets by Steven Wesley Lam (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(aab)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against District 12 Probation and Parol, District 39 Probation and Parol, Rockingham County Commonwealth Attorneys, Rockingham/Harrisonburg Circuit Court, filed by Steven Wesley Lam.(aab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lam v. Rockingham/Harrisonburg Circuit Court et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Wesley Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rockingham/Harrisonburg Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District 39 Probation and Parol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District 12 Probation and Parol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rockingham County Commonwealth Attorneys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?