Hallacher v. The Allstate Insurance Company
| Keith Hallacher |
| The Allstate Insurance Company |
| 7:2021cv00466 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORAL ORDER : On October 7, 2021, Defendant The Allstate Insurance Company moved to dismiss Plaintiff Keith Hallacher's complaint. (ECF No. #9 ) Within 21 days of service of that motion, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint as a matter of right under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). (ECF No. #16 ) Because the amended complaint supplants Plaintiffs original complaint and renders it a nullity, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss (ECF No. #9 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Entered by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 10/29/2021. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(ck)
|
|
Filing 17
Plaintiff's Response to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS Pursuant to Rules 8(a) and 12(B)(6) filed by Keith Hallacher. (ams)
|
|
Filing 16
AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Allstate Insurance Company, filed by Keith Hallacher.(ams)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Lloyd Murch on behalf of The Allstate Insurance Company (Murch, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 MOTION for Kevin L. Murch to Appear Pro Hac Vice Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 10/19/2021. (ams)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 10/18/2021. (ams)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Judge Thomas T. Cullen for all further proceedings. Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 10/18/2021. (ams)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Kevin L. Murch to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AVAWDC-3812328. by The Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Granting Motion for PHV Admission of Kevin L. Murch)(Memmer, C.)
|
|
Filing 10
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by The Allstate Insurance Company. (Memmer, C.)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by The Allstate Insurance Company. (Memmer, C.)
|
|
Filing 8
Original State Court Record(s) received from Roanoke City Circuit Court, case number(s) CL21001624-00 (ams)
|
|
Filing 7
Oral ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Allstate Insurance Company's answer is due on or before 10/7/2021. Entered by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on September 10, 2021. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.(mf)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint by The Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Kurtz, Chad)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 9/7/2021. (Order mailed to Plaintiff's attorney as listed on the state court complaint via US Mail)(ams)
|
|
Filing 4
Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Allstate Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC for The Allstate Insurance Company. (Kurtz, Chad)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Filing Requirement to The Allstate Insurance Company - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (ams)
|
|
Filing 2
Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (ams)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, case number CL2100624-00. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402 receipt # AVAWDC-3782724), filed by The Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Complaint)(ams)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hallacher v. The Allstate Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keith Hallacher | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Allstate Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Chad Evin Kurtz |
| Represented By: | C. Kailani Memmer |
| Represented By: | Johneal Moore White |
| Represented By: | Kevin Lloyd Murch |
| Represented By: | Victor S. Skaff, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
