Mumford v. Bostic et al
Paul Mumford |
J.D. Bostic, Colonel Gary T. Settle, D.A. Lockliear, James K. Liss and W. Steven Flaherty |
7:2021cv00598 |
November 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Michael F Urbanski |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Mumford as to W. Steven Flaherty served on 1/7/2022, answer due 1/28/2022; (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed as to James K. Liss served on 1/7/2022, answer due 1/28/2022.(sln) (Copy of executed summons mailed to Prose party via US mail) Modified docket text on 1/12/2022 to reflect copy mailed to prose party (sln). |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Mumford. D.A. Lockliear served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/27/2022. (Copy of executed summons mailed to Prose party via US mail.) (sln) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued as to W. Steven Flaherty (Attachments: #1 Summons as to James K. Liss)(sln) |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons and USM-285 form for James K. Liss by Paul Mumford (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons and USM-285 form W. Steven Flaherty)(sln) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/5/2022) (sln). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2022: #2 Envelope) (sln). Modified docket text on 1/6/2022 to include USM form (sln). |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Mumford. J.D. Bostic served on 1/4/2022, answer due 1/25/2022.(Copy of executed summons mailed to Prose party via US mail)(sln) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Mumford. Gary T. Settle served on 12/28/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Copy of executed summons mailed to Prose party via US mail)(aab) |
Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Paul Mumford as to W. Steven Flaherty, James K. Liss. (Copy of unexecuted summonses mailed to prose party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to J.D. Bostic (Attachments: #1 USM285 form - JD Bostic, #2 Summons Issued as to Colonel Gary T. Settle, #3 USM285 form - Colonel Gary T. Settle, #4 Summons Issued as to DA Lockliear, #5 USM285 form - DA Lockliear, #6 Summons Issued as to James K. Liss, #7 USM285 form - James K. Liss, #8 Summons Issued as to W. Steven Flaherty, #9 USM285 form - W. Steven Flaherty, #10 Envelope received via US Mail)(sln) |
Filing 6 Clerk's Office Response re #5 Proposed Summons . (aab) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons for W. Steven Flaherty, James K. Liss, Gary T. Settle, D.A. Lockliear, J.D. Bostic by Paul Mumford. (aab) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against J.D. Bostic, W. Steven Flaherty, James K. Liss, D.A. Lockliear, Gary T. Settle. Filed by Paul Mumford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Section 9.1-910, #2 Exhibit B-Kentucky, #3 Exhibit C-Virginia, #4 Envelope)(sln) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If needed, forms may also be found at #www.vawd.uscourts.gov/forms.aspx Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 12/01/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(sln) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against J.D. Bostic, W. Steven Flaherty, James K. Liss, D.A. Lockliear, Gary T. Settle, filed by Paul Mumford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Kentucky State Police Letter, #2 Exhibit 2: Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police Sex Offender and Crimes Against Minors Re-Registration and Address Verification Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sln). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Mumford. (sln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.