Kaufmann v. Hill
Plaintiff: Chase Trevor Kaufmann
Defendant: Daniel Hill
Case Number: 7:2022cv00060
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Thomas T Cullen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: It is ORDERED that Kaufmann's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, his complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim, and this action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 3/17/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
March 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 3/17/2022. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Daniel Hill, filed by Chase Trevor Kaufmann.(slt)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order for to Respond with an Amended Complaint within 14 days. Responses due by 3/24/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 3/4/2022. (Order and 1983 form mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Chase Trevor Kaufmann (tvt)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 3/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 2/15/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Chase Trevor Kaufmann (tvt)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account For the Months of August through December 2021; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Responses due by 2/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 1/31/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by Chase Trevor Kaufmann (aab)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Daniel Hill, filed by Chase Trevor Kaufmann.(aab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaufmann v. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chase Trevor Kaufmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?