Spinner v. Rettig et al
Vincent Spinner |
Charles T. Rettig, John Koskinen, Nina Bolin and Maureen Sanders |
7:2022cv00064 |
February 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
James P Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice for plaintiff's failure to comply and the action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 3/2/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 3 OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 3/2/2022. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 2 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC 1331 Bivens Act; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Responses due by 2/24/2022. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 2/1/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 Bivens Act against Nina Bolin, John Koskinen, Charles T. Rettig, Maureen Sanders, filed by Vincent Spinner. (Attachments: #1 7:21cv646 Opinion and Order)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.