Ford v. Northam et al
| Raymond A. Ford, Jr. |
| Ralph Northam, Glenn Youngkin, Harold Clarke, Kemsy Bowles, Kimberly Soutter, S. Ruiz, C. Walker, Ashlyn Hartsook, Nick Meyer and S. Moe-Willis |
| 7:2022cv00122 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORAL Order - Plaintiff has paid the entire filing fee. Because plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff is responsible for serving defendant(s) and shall have 90 (ninety) days from the date of this order to accomplish service. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide plaintiff with the procedural instructions for service, as well as copies of basic service documents. If plaintiff fails to accomplish service within 90 days, his case may be dismissed without prejudice. If plaintiff believes he/she is unable to afford service of process, he/she may apply to proceed in forma pauperis. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 4/6/2022. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 7
Letter/Request regarding filing fee and complaint about not receiving mail in a timely manner by Raymond A. Ford, Jr. (aab)
|
|
Filing Fee Received $ 402.00, receipt number 700071492 (aab)
|
|
Filing 6
ORAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion asking for additional time to pay the full filing fee (Dkt. No. 5) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall either pay the full filing fee or submit the financial information as directed in the courts March 9, 2022 order within thirty days of this order. The Clerk is directed to send Ford both a printed copy of this order and another copy of the courts March 9, 2022 order with enclosures. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 4/4/2022. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (This Order and Order #4 with enclosures mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Filing Fee by Raymond A. Ford, Jr. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab)
|
|
Filing 4
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Responses due by 4/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 3/9/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 3
FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT-Statements for the months of August 2021 through February 2022, by Raymond A. Ford, Jr (aab)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond A. Ford, Jr. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kemsy Bowles, Harold Clarke, Ashlyn Hartsook, Nick Meyer, S. Moe-Willis, Ralph Northam, S. Ruiz, Kimberly Soutter, C. Walker, Glenn Youngkin, filed by Raymond A. Ford, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Affidavit in Compliance, #3 Table of Contents, #4 Cover Letter)(Clerk sending docket sheet) (aab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
